|
Sackett v. EPA: New Rules on Judicial Review of Federal Enforcement Actions Audio Download |
 |
This audio download was recorded from an April 11, 2012, "Quick Teleconference," sponsored by the ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources.
The ABA is not seeking CLE credit for this program.
You will not receive CLE credit for listening. This electronic product includes the MP3 audio file of the program and any program materials. |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Program Overview:
The recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Sackett v. EPA has important environmental regulation implications. This panel of distinguished speakers, which includes the attorney who argued the case in the Supreme Court on the Sacketts' behalf, will discuss the case and its implications.
In Sackett, The Supreme Court held that EPA administrative compliance orders could be challenged in court. This is a win for regulated entities, but pro-environment groups fear that the holding will have a chilling effect on federal enforcement of environmental laws. The case also presents an interesting intersection of environmental and administrative law. This panel will place the holding in context, and discuss the real-world implications for regulated entities, federal agencies, and environmental law practitioners.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
This download includes the MP3 audio file and the course materials in PDF files. Both files will be delivered together in a ZIP file. To play an audio download in MP3 format, your will need a media player such as iTunes,Windows Media Player, RealPlayer, or Quicktime. For instructions on loading MP3 files to a portable media device, please refer to your device's instruction manual.
Course materials require Adobe Reader®.

|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Educational Objectives: -Inform people about ramifications of this important Supreme Court decision on environmental issues and EPA's enforcement authority; and -Discuss likely real-world implications of the decision, especially as they pertain to administrative law, federal enforcement actions, and property rights.
Faculty:
Moderator: Kim Diana Connolly, SUNY Buffalo Law School, Buffalo, NY
Panelists: John Cruden, Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC Adam Kushner, Hogan Lovells LLP, Washington, DC Lawrence Levine, Natural Resources Defense Counsel, New York, NY Damien Schiff, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Immediately after checkout, the download file(s) will be available in Your Downloads (accessible in the left navigation area of the Web Store when logged in).
|
|
|
|
 |
|