Formal Ethics Opinion 97-409
American Bar Association - Defending Liberty, Pursuing Justice ABA
View Cart & Check Out
ABA Web Store
                               
...the source you trust for practical legal information.
Sign In

View Cart & Check Out

Track Orders

Shipping Rates

Help

Administrative Law

Antitrust Law

Appellate Advocacy

Banking Law

Bankruptcy Law

Bar Services & Public Service

Billing

Biographies

Business Law

Career Development

Children and the Law

Civil Practice & Procedure

Commercial Law

Communications & Media Law

Constitutional Law

Construction Law

Consumer Law

Corporate Law

Courts

Criminal Law

Disability Law

Dispute Resolution

E-Commerce & Cyberspace Law

Education Law

Elder Law

Employee Benefits

Energy & Natural Resources Law

Entertainment & Sports Law

Environmental Law

Estate Planning

Ethics & Professional Responsibility

Ethics Opinions

Evidence

Family Law

Financial Management

Franchise Law

General Practice

Government Law

Health Law

Human Rights Law

Immigration Law

Insurance Law

Intellectual Property Law

International Law

Labor & Employment Law

Law Day

Law Practice Management

Law School, Law Students

Lawyer Assistance Programs

Lawyers' Professional Liability

Legal Aid/Public Defender

Legal Education & Admissions to the Bar

Legal Research & Writing

Legal Technology

Litigation

Management / Organizational Skills

Marketing

Mergers & Acquisitions

National Security Law

Nonprofit Law

Paralegals & Legal Assistants

Partnerships & Unincorporated Entities

Personal Injury Law

Pro Bono

Products Liability

Public Contract Law

Public Education

Real Estate Law

Reference

Science & Technology Law

Securities Law

Solos and Small Firms

Taxation

Tort Law

Transportation Law

Trial Advocacy

Women & Minority Lawyers

Zoning & Land Use


Advanced Search
Site Map
E-Products

Formal Ethics Opinion 97-409

Formal Ethics Opinion 97-409
Product Code: 5611100409
Sponsoring Entities: The Center for Professional Responsibility
Topics: Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Ethics Opinions
Format: PDF - 5611100409
Pricing: $20.00 (Regular)
Quantity:
 
About the Product

Conflicts of Interest: Successive Government and Private Employment

The conflict of interest obligations of a former government lawyer under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct are determined by Rule 1.11 and not by Rule 1.9(a) and (b). A former government lawyer is, however, subject to the provisions of Rule 1.9(c), which prohibits the use of information relating to her representation of the government to the disadvantage of her former government client where the information has not become generally known, and the disclosure of such information, except as permitted or required by Rules 1.6 and 3.3.

Under Rule 1.11, a former government lawyer is disqualified from representing private clients where she "participated personally and substantially as a public officer or employee" in the same "particular matter" at issue in the subsequent representation, whether or not she would be adverse to her former government client; she is not forbidden from representing private parties in matters in which she did not so participate, or in any matters not involving "a discrete and isolatable transaction or set of transactions between identifiable parties," except where she has obtained "confidential government information" about an adverse third party. See Rule 1.11(a) and (b); ABA Formal Opinion 342.

A former government lawyer who is personally disqualified from representing a private client in a matter may be screened pursuant to Rule 1.11(a) to enable other lawyers in her new firm to undertake the representation, whether her disqualification arises under Rule 1.11(a) or Rule 1.9(c).

A lawyer formerly employed by a government claims administration agency is not disqualified under Rule 1.11 from representing private claimants before the agency except in connection with particular claims she personally handled while in government service. She may also represent a private party in a challenge to generally applicable agency rules, even though she was herself personally involved in the development and implementation of those rules, subject only to the constraints imposed by Rule 1.9(c) on her use or disclosure of information relating to her representation of the government that has not become generally known. In any case, if the lawyer is herself personally disqualified, members of her firm may undertake the representation if she is appropriately screened.

Accessing Your Download after Purchase

Immediately after checkout, the download file(s) will be available in Your Downloads (accessible in the left navigation area of the Web Store when logged in).