American Bar Association
 
Criminal Justice Section: Amicus Review Committee

Criminal Justice Section:
Amicus Review Committee


About The Committee



The Committee reviews requests that the Section seek ABA Board of Governors approval for amicus curiae briefs filed on behalf of the Association on issues related to criminal law. Factors considered when making a recommendation to the Section leadership concern the importance of the issue, the existence of relevant ABA policy, the appropriateness of ABA amicus participation in the court where the issue is currently being heard, specific contributions that ABA amicus participation would make over and beyond the arguments of the parties, and the quality of the proposed brief.



Goals

The Amicus Committee will make every effort to respond to the increasing number of requests for Criminal Justice Section applications for ABA amicus briefs. The Committee is also monitoring pending Petitions for Certiorari and noting cases where the ABA might want to file a brief. As it has in the past, the Committee will consider such requests in light of the importance of the issue and its significance to lawyers, the legal profession or compelling public interest; applicable ABA policy; the court in which the case is pending; the timeline for submission of the brief; and identification of a qualified brief writer.

Based on its review, the Committee will make recommendations to the Section Council or its Executive Committee. Upon Section approval and to the extent necessary and appropriate, the Committee will assist in drafting the application to the ABA Standing Committee on Amicus Curiae Briefs and, if the application is approved by the Board of Governors, in editing the draft brief.


Recent Briefs

Amicus Brief on Incorrect legal advice given to a non-citizen defendant regarding immigration consequences

At the request of the Criminal Justice Section’s Amicus Committee, The American Bar Association filed an amicus brief in Lee v. United States, 16-327. This case involved a lawful permanent resident who was given incorrect legal advice as to immigration consequences whilst facing criminal prosecution, as the charges he plead guilty to would result in mandatory and permanent deportation. On appeal, the government conceded that the attorney’s representation was ineffective and fell below prevailing professional norms. The issue before the Supreme Court is whether a defendant is prejudiced by bad advice, and whether it is irrational for an immigrant to risk trial with the hopes of avoiding deportation. The amicus brief, drafted by McDermott Will & Emery, focused heavily on CJS resolutions drafted in the aftermath of Padilla v. Kentucky, as well as the new Prosecution and Defense Function Standards that address immigration considerations.

________________

Recent ABA amicus briefs initiated or supported by the Criminal Justice Section are listed below. For descriptions of these briefs, click here http://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/policy/amicus_briefs.html

For copies of the individual briefs, click on the individual listings.

Halbert v. Michigan

House v. Bell

Virginia v. Moore

Woodford v. Ngo


Books From Our Committee

    Leadership

    Co-Chairs:

    Becker, Erin
    Dwyer, Mark
    Green, Bruce
    Little, Rory

    Committee Roster  


    Programs, Meetings & Events

    Section Events

      31st Annual National Institute on White Collar Crime

      03/08/2017-03/10/2017
      Fontainebleau
      Miami Beach

      Make Your Hotel Reservation Today! The deadline is February 17, 2017 to get the group rate. The Fontainebleau is sold out, but our overflow hotel is still available as an option: Grand Beach Hotel Miami Beach 4835 Collins Avenue Miami Beach, FL 33140 Phone: (877) 538-8666 MiamiHotelGrandBeach.com ...

      Keeping it Together: Mediation in the Era of Civil Unrest

      03/23/2017-03/23/2017

      The event will be held on 03/23/2017. The format is Web. The event sponsor(s) are Human Rights,Center for Professional Development,Criminal Justice Section,Section of Dispute Resolution,Government and Public Sector Lawyers Division,Solo, Small Firm and General Practice Division,Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice,Section of State and Local Government Law,Division for Public Services,Pro Bono and Public Service. The event has 1.50 CLE Credits .

      Combating Bias and Increasing Inclusion in the Legal Profession

      03/28/2017-03/28/2017

      The event will be held on 03/28/2017. The format is Web. The event sponsor(s) are Commission on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity,Commission on Homelessness and Poverty,Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs,Commission on Law and Aging,Commission on Disability Rights,Center for Professional Development,Criminal Justice Section,Commission on Women In the Profession,Section of Dispute Resolution,Law Practice Division,Section of Family Law,Solo, Small Firm and General Practice Division,Center for Human Rights,Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice,Section of Legal Edu. The event has 1.50 CLE Credits .


    Resources

    Modified by Kyo Suh on February 16, 2017

    Back to Top