The ruling is a result of California Labor Code cases.
The rift comes in Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLC.
The ruling comes in Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Company, LLC.
By Robert J. Herrington
The proposed changes could have a great impact for years to come.
By Andrew Trask
The question has long been considered a vital case management tool.
By Timothy G. Blood and Paula M. Roach
The doctrine's widespread use begs for guidance that only this Federal Rule can provide.
By Paul G. Karlsgodt and Jacqueline K. Matthews
A starting point in the discussion.
If you are involved in a multidistrict litigation case it may seem overwhelming—but fear not. Listen as veteran litigator Greg Cook explains the process and rules regarding the Multidistrict Litigation Panel (MDL Panel). (8:12 min)
Rule 23(a) has four elements that must be proven prior to class certification. Listen as Kathryn Honecker explains salient points of one of the elements—numerosity. (14:17 min)
Hear as Jeff Gardner explains how this exception works and the ways in which it may affect your clients. (8:54 min)
The early stages of complex litigation are often the most important in delivering a successful result for your client. This presentation will go through the critical preliminary steps litigators should take to ensure that their case gets off to the right start. (56:46)
This Roundtable examines the holding in this newly announced decision—and examines what the holding may mean for future parens patriae actions—and for other types of quasi-class actions or mass actions. It also examines the strategy impact of this new decision. (56:12)
The Supreme Court’s First Decision on the Class Action Fairness Act: Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles
The Supreme Court has issued its first decision interpreting the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). In a unanimous decision, the Court held that, prior to certification, a named plaintiff’s stipulation that the putative class would not seek more than $5 million did not defeat jurisdiction under CAFA. (1:01:03)
Please join us for the CADS' Committee's bi-monthly call on Monday, August 31, noon (PT) / 2 p.m. (CT) / 3 p.m. (ET). The dial in number is 888-387-8686; the access code is 7958 864.
Do you enjoy teaching others about a topic but are short on time? If so, we have the perfect opportunity for you.
The committee recently published its updated state law class action survey. The book is an excellent tool for in-house and outside counsel who litigate class actions in state forums.
Class Actions & Derivative Suits Leadership
|Cochairs||Web Editors||Newsletter Editors|
Los Angeles, CA
San Francisco, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Los Angeles, CA