![]() |
|
Case Notes
- » Firm Not Liable for Issuing Legal Opinion Letter in Fraudulent Deal
Fortress Credit Corp., et al v. Dechert LLP, 2011 NY Slip Op 08626 - » Batson Challenge Does Not Extend to Unidentified “Minorities”
Gray v. Brady --- F. 3d ---, 2010 WL 256324 (1st Cir. 2010) - » Responsibility for Pending Litigation Survives Move to In-House Position
Collum v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108410 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 2009) - » ABA Formal Opinion Addresses Disclosures Needed When Lawyers Change Firms
ABA Formal Opinion 09-455 - » A Prosecutor’s Duty to Disclose under Rule 3.8(d)
ABA Formal Opinion 09-454 - » Good Manners Can Be Actionable–Failure to be “Sensitive and Professionally Responsive” Breaches Engagement Letter
Abramson v. Wildman 964 A.2d 703 (Md. Ct. App. Feb. 4, 2009) - » Failure to Show Professional Courtesy Results in Failure to Receive Fees
Sahyers v. Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L., --- F.3d ----, 2009 WL 510963 (11th Cir. 2009) - » A Warning to the Inexperienced: Errors May Cross Ethical Lines
In re Estrada, 143 P.3d 731 (N.M. 2006) - » Serving the Right Client
Grosser-Samuels v. Jacquelin Designs Enterprises, 448 F. Supp. 2d 772 (N.D. Tex. 2006) - » The Perils of Publicity |

Sealed Party v. Sealed Party, ___ F. Supp.2d ____, 2006 WL 1207732 (S.D. Tex. 2006) - » Rule 4.2 and the Pro Se Lawyer |

In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haley, 126 P.3d 1262 (Wash. 2006) - » When the Waiver Just Won’t Do: How the Government Can Conflict Out Defense Counsel |

Columbus Bar Association v. Ross, 839 N.E.2d 918 (Ohio 2006) - » The Disqualifying Consultation |

Pound v. DeMera DeMera Cameron, 36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 922 (2005)




