September 2006
LETTER FROM THE ONLINE EDITOR
Congress Probes Abuses in Mass Tort Screenings
Silicosis claims were “manufactured for
money”
A congressional subcommittee highlighted potentially widespread abuses in mass
tort litigation in recent hearings investigating how doctors, X-ray screening
companies, and the plaintiff-side law firms that employed them apparently manufactured
thousands of personal injury claims for silicosis, a lung disease caused by inhaling
silica dust in mining and sandblasting. Some of the doctors, screening firms,
and law firms are well-known participants in asbestos litigation.
Utah to Allow Class Action Waivers in Consumer Credit Agreements
Enforceability an open question
Under a recently-enacted Utah statute sure to ignite further debate regarding
the fairness of limiting access to the courts, consumers may begin to see new
language in credit card agreements that eliminates their rights to participate
in class actions.
California High Court Rejects Harassment Claim
Sexual banter on set of ‘Friends’ not actionable
Can the use of vulgar language in the workplace constitute harassment based on sex within the meaning of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)? Perhaps, according to the California Supreme Court, but not in the recent case of Lyle v. Warner Bros. Television Productions.
- » Is a Foul Ball More Forseeable Than a Slice? |

- » Class Action Counsel Evaluate Impact of Milberg Weiss Indictment |

- » Bar Associations and Law Firms Renew Commitment to Mentoring |

- » FDA Preemptive Strike? |

- » Third Circuit Refuses to Enjoin DOJ Indictments |

- » Small Firms Getting Great Work |

- » Associates’ Salaries on the Rise |

- » New
Book Offers Advice from the “Curmudgeon” |

- » Rescinding Insurer May Deny Defense Duty |

- » Fee Applications and Block Billing Don’t Mix |

- » Download
Full Issue for September 2006 |



